Thursday, March 13, 2014
I am against global warming alarmism, and against the myth that climate change is a dominant threat to anything.
Like all groundless myths that align popular thought, this particular myth should be exposed and denounced.
In this case, exposing the myth is a self-image threat to some, a career threat to others, and a financial or legitimacy threat to certain institutions and corporations: indoctrinated eco-lobbyists, careerist scientists, carbon economy parasites and predators...
I reject the argument that "it is positive to support this myth of a dominant threat from climate change irrespective of whether it is true or not". Supporting this myth provides a pretext for soft, ineffective, and counter-productive politics of "change", and supports the hegemony that is actively seeking to broaden and enforce a carbon economy that is not and will never be democratically controlled.
The way to fight habitat and ecological destruction is to fight habitat and ecological destruction. The way to fight injustice is to fight injustice. CO2 is not leverage for activists, it is a manipulation.
A list of my work in this area is HERE.
-- Denis Rancourt
Dr. Denis G. Rancourt is a former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada. He is known for his applications of physics education research (TVO Interview). He practiced various areas of science (environmental geochemistry, soil science, spectroscopy, condensed matter physics, materials science) which were funded by a national agency, has published over 100 articles in leading scientific journals, and has written several social commentary essays. He is the author of the book Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Carbon trading is rushing ahead under the directives of the real bosses. You know it's a done deal when the Left intelligentsia makes a documentary film to question whether or not it's the best idea... HERE.
Whether or not it's the best "solution" to a displaced and fabricated problem that is accepted because establishment scientists are objective, smart, and well intentioned... (vs. careerist, obedient and naive)
The only hope to kill this new instrument of global financial predation would be to reject "climate change" for the psycho-transfer device that it is and to start thinking for ourselves but it ain't gonna happen on the Left...
Versus a video attempt to inject sanity: