tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4828122657384873884.post1622328643719406697..comments2023-10-17T08:02:47.368-04:00Comments on DENIS RANCOURT ON CLIMATE: Dr. Jean-Louis Pinault explains his idea about global climate forcing and his experience with climate politicsDenis Rancourthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16743375141824505606noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4828122657384873884.post-43524326337555772202015-02-19T13:39:36.057-05:002015-02-19T13:39:36.057-05:00a solar energy car made by amateurs have crossed A...a solar energy car made by amateurs have crossed Australia, Why car´s factories do not want to know that?, petroleum´s particular economic interests. Shame politicianstonyonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08253501266473243514noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4828122657384873884.post-21701105327037872342014-09-09T06:48:55.273-04:002014-09-09T06:48:55.273-04:00"The tropical oceanic resonance is one of the..."The tropical oceanic resonance is one of the drivers of ocean surface circulation and contributes to the formation of strong western boundary currents"<br /><br />too bad for Sverdrup (1947) and Stommel (1948) !<br /><br />Sverdrup, H.U., Wind-Driven Currents in a Baroclinic Ocean; with Application to the Equatorial Currents of the Eastern Pacific, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1947, 33, 318-326.<br /><br />Stommel, H., The westward intensification of wind-driven ocean currents, Trans. <br />Amer. Geophys. Union, 1948, 29, 202-206.Pierrickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12714551984561996169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4828122657384873884.post-22254782338011834132014-05-31T14:20:31.464-04:002014-05-31T14:20:31.464-04:00Berthold Klein… Bravo!
The lending of evidence to...Berthold Klein… Bravo!<br /><br />The lending of evidence to a hypothesis indeed rests upon a process of falsification. It is through rigorous tests and resulting inability to falsify the null hypothesis that the alternate hypothesis is given support.<br /><br />A hypothesis that is constructed in a way that it cannot be falsified is itself false and not worthy of scientific inquiry. Human caused global warming s such a hypothesis.<br /><br />It's nice the see someone who understands how "real" science actually works.HankHnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4828122657384873884.post-68698866595283014012014-05-28T14:55:24.109-04:002014-05-28T14:55:24.109-04:00The atmosphere contains between 36 and 72% H2O and...The atmosphere contains between 36 and 72% H2O and only 400 ppm CO2 according to latest research data.<br />Who is the brave who says CO2 is responsible for Global Warming?<br />The brave who has no idea what fallacy the left "feeds" him.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4828122657384873884.post-9412710389592102632014-05-28T00:34:35.389-04:002014-05-28T00:34:35.389-04:00Albert Einstein once said, “No amount of experimen...Albert Einstein once said, “No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” Einstein’s words express a foundational principle of science intoned by the logician, Karl Popper: Falsifiability. In order to verify a hypothesis there must be a test by which it can be proved false. A thousand observations may appear to verify a hypothesis, but one critical failure could result in its demise. The history of science is littered with such examples.<br />Part 1<br />1. <br />It appears that no one has asked the very critical question-Where is the credible test/experiment that proves that the Greenhouse gas effect exists? There is another important question that has not been asked is "Where is the credible experiments that show that reducing the CO2 content in the atmosphere will cause a decrease in atmospheric temperature? <br />Looking at the great quote from Albert Einstein above- If one experiment shows that an important part of the Hypotheses of Greenhouse gas effect cannot be proved or is disproved it is very likely that the Hypotheses is false from beginning to end.<br />Here is an experiment that shows that at least 5 of the features of the Hypotheses are false and here is a reference to another experiment that shows that another feature is ass backward as presented by the CAGW crowd. <br />The Greenhouse Effect Explored<br />Written by Carl Brehmer | 26 May 2012<br />Is “Water Vapor Feedback” Positive or Negative?<br />Exploiting the medium of Youtube Carl Brehmer is drawing wider attention to a fascinating experiment he performed to test the climatic impacts of water in our atmosphere.<br />Carl explains, “An essential element of the “greenhouse effect” hypothesis is the positive “water vapor feedback” hypothesis. That is, if something causes an increase in the temperature this will cause an increase in the evaporation of water into water vapor.”<br />Another factor that even the meteorologists have not included in there pretend thinking is "evaporative cooling that is occurring on at least 99.95 % of the earth's surface. <br /><br /><br />The Experiment that Failed and can save the World trillions.<br />Proving the “greenhouse gas effect” does not exist!<br />By Berthold Klein P.E 1-15-2012 Incorporation of comments of Dr.'s Pierre Latour, Dr. Nasif Nahle and others.<br />Dedication<br /><br />To Robert W. Wood (1909) who first demonstrated that the Hypotheses of the “greenhouse effect in the atmosphere”were unscientific. To all the physicists and other scientists since Professor Wood who has added sound technical and scientific knowledge to many related field that have strengthened the case against the Hoax.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13898284891048795593noreply@blogger.com