Showing posts with label Climategate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climategate. Show all posts

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Finally! -- The needed politically-driven science will be funded

http://www.tempdatareview.org/

Science needs competition from opposing views. However, politics drives funded establishment science. That is trivially obvious. Government funding predominantly determines the public research of "independant" university researchers.

In "climate science" there is an overwhelming global alignment towards carbon alarmism, driven by the US desire to deepen its control and exploitation of the economies of India and China and other nations via carbon extortion mechanisms.

As a result, dissenting scientific perspectives are atrophied and the needed competition of ideas and interpretations is crippled.

One of the major scams that has been allowed to propagate via a self-serving scientific establishment is the scam related to "extracting" a mean global surface temperature.

The present warming "pause" may well be an artifact of a continuous-warming data-manipulation scam that no longer is able to survive compatibility with the raw data. I propose that the "pause" is due to a partial rollback of enthusiastic fixing of the data. Maybe time will tell.

Anyway, thanks to a relatively small but now organized political opposition to carbon alarmism, apparently mostly based on US and US-aligned unglobalized domestic interests (domestic oil and shale not yet controlled by the energy giants that must follow US geopolitical machinations), there is now sufficient political opposition that some dissenting science can be encouraged.

Such a project worthy of note was recently announced:


This is a needed and brilliantly strategic approach. The coalition of scientists aims to directly examine how their colleagues have been extracting the mean global surface temperature.

As background, the biggest problem is that prestige journals such as Science and Nature and others never require authors to publicly file all their raw data and all their analysis methods. As such, the fundamental premise of scientific verifiability is allowed to be trashed.

The new coalition will attack this fatal flaw in the scientific debate. Let it be transparent!


Links to the climate science essays and articles of the author of this note are HERE.

Dr. Denis G. Rancourt is a former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada. He is known for his applications of physics education research (TVO Interview). He has published over 100 articles in leading scientific journals, in the areas of spectroscopy, condensed matter physics, and environmental science.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

On the gargantuan lie of climate change science (re-posted)

[Illustration: Ravy Puth]

THIS article deconstructs the scientific building blocks used to promote the myth of an established anthropogenic global warming (AGW) (or climate change). IT is a definitive and incisive critique of the dominant climate science narrative; going to the heart of the main incorrect underlying assumptions and devices of the AGW construct.

Monday, May 17, 2010

In-depth radio interview with Marc Morano of ClimateDepot

Denis rancourt interviewed Marc Morano from Climate Depot for a solid hour on CHUO 89.1 FM, Ottawa, The Five O'Clock Train.

A lot of ground was covered, including some hard questions about Climate Depot's funding.


Wednesday, December 23, 2009

In French / en francais: Montreal radio interview with Denis Rancourt on Climategate

In French / en francais

98.5 FM radio Montreal, Puisqu'il faut se lever, 27 November 2009, 8:25am.

Denis Rancourt interviewed by Paul Archand on global warming and "Climategate".


Alternatively, the radio interview is available as a video link:

2009-12-985fm - Entrevue Denis Rancourt -Climategate
Uploaded by exprofesso. - Up-to-the minute news videos.


More about Denis Rancourt HERE.


Key essays about global warming myth of a dominant threat:

Friday, December 4, 2009

Corporate Climate Coup Confirmed


by David F. Noble

In the wake of the climate change meltdown, we might perhaps still have something like a predictive science here but it's not about global warming. Back in May, 2007 I published an article entitled "the Corporate Climate Coup" in which I offered a brief history of the corporate campaign begun in the late 1990's to promote the profit-prospecting idea that the planet is warming up due to anthropogenic CO2 emissions (AGW). I described in some detail the corporate political agenda to derail the anti-globalization movement and the concurrent corporate economic agenda to supplant the moribund dot.com bubble with a new bonanza based upon carbon trading. I identified the central corporate players, notable among them the powerhouse investment bank Goldman Sachs, Generation Investment Management (Al Gore's Goldman Sachs spin-off), and two of the world's four largest oil companies, BP and Shell, both Goldman Sachs clients. The article pointed out how their campaign was grounded upon the restoration of faith in two of the main targets of the anti-globalization movement: the imagined beneficence of the self-regulating market and, most stridently, the allegedly unimpeachable authority of science. That ideological restoration effort is now doubly in doubt. As popular dismay mounts over the scurrilous surreality of the market-based carbon-trading scam, the corporate campaign has been thrown into possibly fatal disarray with the inelegant demolition of the preposterous pretensions of pure, peer-reviewed, science. And as the veil is lifted from the habitat of the gaming wizards of global warming, the UK Climatic Research Unit at East Anglia University, we would expect, given this historical review of the political economy of AGW, to find familiar faces, and we do. There they are, in the fine print of the history of the outfit (www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/about/history), among the funders of the Nobel-lauded independent minds that supposedly certified our sanity in this madness: BP and Shell. You guessed it.

LINKS:
Corporate Climate Coup
Global Warming: Truth or Dare?
Regression on the Left

David F. Noble is a historian of science and technology and a professor at York University, Toronto, Canada.