Sunday, April 26, 2015

Finally! -- The needed politically-driven science will be funded

http://www.tempdatareview.org/

Science needs competition from opposing views. However, politics drives funded establishment science. That is trivially obvious. Government funding predominantly determines the public research of "independant" university researchers.

In "climate science" there is an overwhelming global alignment towards carbon alarmism, driven by the US desire to deepen its control and exploitation of the economies of India and China and other nations via carbon extortion mechanisms.

As a result, dissenting scientific perspectives are atrophied and the needed competition of ideas and interpretations is crippled.

One of the major scams that has been allowed to propagate via a self-serving scientific establishment is the scam related to "extracting" a mean global surface temperature.

The present warming "pause" may well be an artifact of a continuous-warming data-manipulation scam that no longer is able to survive compatibility with the raw data. I propose that the "pause" is due to a partial rollback of enthusiastic fixing of the data. Maybe time will tell.

Anyway, thanks to a relatively small but now organized political opposition to carbon alarmism, apparently mostly based on US and US-aligned unglobalized domestic interests (domestic oil and shale not yet controlled by the energy giants that must follow US geopolitical machinations), there is now sufficient political opposition that some dissenting science can be encouraged.

Such a project worthy of note was recently announced:


This is a needed and brilliantly strategic approach. The coalition of scientists aims to directly examine how their colleagues have been extracting the mean global surface temperature.

As background, the biggest problem is that prestige journals such as Science and Nature and others never require authors to publicly file all their raw data and all their analysis methods. As such, the fundamental premise of scientific verifiability is allowed to be trashed.

The new coalition will attack this fatal flaw in the scientific debate. Let it be transparent!


Links to the climate science essays and articles of the author of this note are HERE.

Dr. Denis G. Rancourt is a former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada. He is known for his applications of physics education research (TVO Interview). He has published over 100 articles in leading scientific journals, in the areas of spectroscopy, condensed matter physics, and environmental science.

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Ottawa event March 27 — The science and geopolitics of climate change - A presentation by Dr. Denis Rancourt



The science and geopolitics of climate change
A presentation by Dr. Denis Rancourt

Friday, March 27, 2015
7 PM (doors open at 6:30 PM)

University of Ottawa
Montpetit building, Room 203 (MNT 203)
 

Denis Rancourt will present a critical analysis about the science and geopolitics of climate change.

This will include descriptive overviews of:
  • the physics of planetary warming
  • planetary processes of carbon fluxes
  • the politics of science funding
  • social and systemic mechanisms of opinion
  • national and UN drivers towards carbon management
  • global and local consequences of carbon management
  • planetary forces of destruction
  • the nature of effective resistance

Dr. Denis G. Rancourt is a former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada. He is known for his applications of physics education research (TVO Interview). He has published over 100 articles in leading scientific journals, in the areas of spectroscopy, condensed matter physics, and environmental science. He has written several social commentary essays. He is the author of the book Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism.

Friday, March 13, 2015

It's about the geopolitics stupid!


By Denis Rancourt

CO2-alarmism is fabricated by the Empire for domestic consumption. Service intellectuals dutifully gobble it up and adopt and project it.

The global legislative instruments of carbon control that are being implemented at breakneck speed in Empire-controlled jurisdictions have nothing to do with "saving the planet" and everything to do with global dominance and predation, in the same way that the World Bank has nothing to do with altruist "development".

"Peak oil" theorists and CO2-alarmists tend to disregard that the Earth is a "planet", not a fragile organism in a precarious micro-habitat, but a "planet".

As a recent example, which allows a view of the underlying geopolitical driving forces, THIS ARTICLE (reading between the lines) explains part of the mechanism whereby oil/gas are a viable USA geopolitical weapon against Russia, and China by extension. Briefly, new-era US production capacity allows the Empire to crash oil prices, using subservient Saudi Arabia, in order to bring Russia down, without itself suffering anything much.

Another consequence is that the Empire's ongoing implementation of "carbon economy" global instruments of coercion and control must deal with resistance from a new array of "small" domestic shale-oil producers, until these are monopolized and fully integrated.


Dr. Denis G. Rancourt is a former tenured and Full Professor of physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada. He is known for his applications of physics education research (TVO Interview). He has published over 100 articles in leading scientific journals, in the areas of spectroscopy, condensed matter physics, and environmental science. He has written several social commentary essays. He is the author of the book Hierarchy and Free Expression in the Fight Against Racism.

Monday, December 15, 2014

CO2 will never determine geopolitics -- It's the other way around!

http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2014/12/05/oil-prices-and-energy-wars-empire-frack-versus-russia.html

It's not complicated: CO2 has no effect, does not matter, and is irrelevant. [1]

It is a diversion meant to facilitate implementation of carbon-economy instruments of exploitation and control. [2] [3] [4]

The fight for environmental and resource-theft justice should not use a false argument, but instead should attack the actual problems: zero-democracy regarding resource theft, habitat destruction, pillaging by government-aided financiers and a certain global military empire, etc. [3] [4]

That the increase in atmospheric CO2 causally threatens habitats, bio-diversity, and life on earth is a baseless and impossible geo-physical conspiracy theory that serves true geo-political conspiracies. Scientists (except some) are led by their peer-reviewed noses to wherever the the ruling class wants [5]. (What? There's a "ruling class"?) (See Noble on "peer review". [6])

Furthermore, to think that geo-environmental CO2-emissions politics could ever somehow curtail exploitation and environmental harm is a paid-for fantasy as unreal as anything Disney could produce.

The actual purpose of geo-environmental CO2-emissions politics, as manipulated by the dominant global empire, can only be to serve that empire and its ruling class, irrespective of environmental and human consequences, and irrespective of negative impacts on the US domestic economy and the domestic economies of US allies.

For a current keyhole-look at what is really going on consider this article by war-correspondent and sociologist Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya:

Oil Prices and Energy Wars: The US Empire of “Frack” versus Russia [fast-link] [source-link]

Dream-on folks.

Friday, September 26, 2014